Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
Fun
|
4/10
|
Depth
|
2/10
|
Character
|
3/10
|
Action
|
5/10
|
Style
|
8/10
|
Twist
|
1/10
|
Overall
|
3.8/10
|
An interesting experimental movie based on the spirit of 1930's
serials. I'm not sure what the creators were shooting for but I'm
afraid this film doesn't really do much of anything.
It
was a bright and sunny Sunday afternoon that I went to watch Sky
Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Having seen previews for
it as far as a year in advance, and having heard all sorts of things
about how revolutionary the look would be, I went in expecting an
over-hyped Hollywood movie of mythic proportions.
It wasn't as bad as I'd expected. Warning, spoilers follow (not
that you wouldn't figure it out from a combination of the first
few minutes of the movie plus what you saw in previews).
Ambiance - sort of
The first few moments of the film reminded me of the first Batman
movie (no, not the one with Adam
West, the one with Michael
Keaton). The Manhattan represented in Sky Captain is a dark
and angular place, full of shadows and softly glowing highlights.
The entirety of the style score I gave this movie comes from the
beauty of a majority of the environments. The faded, timeworn look
of the entire piece makes the parts where vibrant colors appear
(like the Union Jacks blazoned on the airships you see in the previews)
that much more eyepopping. If only they'd been timed for impact
(like that little girl in the red dress in Schindler's
List) rather than appearing randomly.
Characters - a mixed bag
The
lovely Gwyneth
Paltrow plays Polly Perkins. She's the spunky reporter covering
the disappearance of six (soon to be seven) scientists. Now, I know
that she's a great actress and very easy on the eyes but I'm afraid
bluescreen acting must not have appealed to her. Her lines all come
out in a sort of deadpan... even when I liked them. I didn't see
any chemistry between her and Joe (which may have been intentional)
outside of some contrived references to their history. Perhaps it's
just something I missed but Polly was a nuisance of Pippic proportions.
Every time her senseless motivations drove her to, for lack of a
better term, be extremely dumb on cue, I buried my face in my hands
and wondered when it would end.
Our leading man, Joe the Sky Captain, is pretty well done by Jude
Law (who I repeatedly confuse with Ewan
McGregor). It seems alot like they were going for a James
Bond style hero (unflappable and charismatic)... and I think
they succeeded to a certain degree. Unfortunately, he just seems
too perfect (most likely intentional) and invincible. Part of enjoying
an action movie is to share in the danger experienced by
the protagonists. That's hard to do when, instead of the human hero,
he faces every situation as if it's already taken care of.
I
was happy to see Giovanni
Ribisi (who played a lamentably suicidal lifesaver in Saving
Private Ryan) as the Q equivalent Dex. Although he was easily
identified as the stereotypical genius greasemonkey, he handled
his sidekick duties with distinction through the early portion of
the movie... and even surprises us with some heroism later. For
some reason, I got a real kick out of the ray gun he tests in his
introductory scene.
Last but not least, there's the ever-hot Angelina
Jolie as Lara Cro- er - Captain Frankie Cook. While I'm not
a tremendous fan of the films she's been the leading lady in, she
honestly brightens this movie up for me when she arrives. You see,
Sky Captain is surprisingly short on action. The entire time Frankie
and her fleet are present, exciting stuff happens. Once she's gone,
things slow down again but at least there's some visceral chemistry
when she and Sky Captain interact. Why he'd want Pippin Perkins
I just don't know.
A Grand Old Adventure - sometimes
I'm
afraid this world-spanning tale of a mad scientist bent on destruction
just isn't all that grand. There are a few niggling continuity problems
(like nearly circumnavigating the globe on one tank of gas in a
souped-up fighter plane) and motivation troubles. Why would a mad
genius kidnap scientists for something he had already built and
automated? Why take things from around the world when you've already
got the hidden super-base and an armada of super powerful robots,
planes, and robot crabs? Why is Polly's little handheld camera more
valuable to her than the survival of the world? How did this script
make it all the way to the big screen?
Sky Captain reminds me, more than anything, of Final
Fantasy: the Spirits Within. An amazing looking movie with all
the emotion of a video game in foreign language text. It was hard
to fight back yawns in the slow bits between the three bonafide
exciting parts... but it was nice to look at. Stills from the movie
are beautiful.
Conclusion - no surprises
I can't think of any particular mood I could be in to want to watch
this one again. It's too confused to be a fantastic period piece,
not exciting enough to be an action film, not dramatic enough to
inspire any feelings, and lacks the personality to overcome the
rest of its shortcomings. That said, it's a testament to the visual
quality that can be achieved with some artistic inspiration and
modern technology. If you want some eye candy, see it once... but
wait for a second-run theater and eat before you go. Then you'll
just be out the price of admission.
Oh, and it was cloudy and started raining the moment I stepped
out of the theater.
Discuss it in the forums!
Note: all images were borrowed from the wallpaper section
of the official Sky
Captain and the World of Tomorrow website.
back to top
|